cpuidle: fix the menu governor to enhance IO performance

this is a revised version of linux upstream commit
69d25870f20c4b2563304f2b79c5300dd60a067e:

"
    cpuidle: fix the menu governor to boost IO performance

    Fix the menu idle governor which balances power savings, energy
    efficiency
    and performance impact.

    The reason for a reworked governor is that there have been
    serious
    performance issues reported with the existing code on Nehalem
    server
    systems.

    To show this I'm sure Andrew wants to see benchmark results:
    (benchmark is "fio", "no cstates" is using "idle=3Dpoll")

            no cstates  current linux   new algorithm
    1 disk      107 Mb/s    85 Mb/s     105 Mb/s
    2 disks     215 Mb/s    123 Mb/s    209 Mb/s
    12 disks    590 Mb/s    320 Mb/s    585 Mb/s

    In various power benchmark measurements, no degredation was found
    by our
    measurement&diagnostics team.  Obviously a small percentage more
    power was
    used in the "fio" benchmark, due to the much higher performance.

    Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
    Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
    Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
    Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
    Cc: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
    Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
"

in Xen version, most logic is similar and with only one exception:
linux use nr_iowait and loadavg to track the pending I/O request,
which however is not visible to Xen. so Xen use the do_irq frequency
to estimate the I/O pressure. this is not as accurate as linux, and
the better approach is to convey guest latency requirement to
hypervisor by virtual C state. this can be the future enhancement.

the detail algorithm description is in code comment. with this new
algorithm, fio benchmark performance improve ~5% with 1 disk. and no
power degration is found in idle case.

Signed-off-by: Yu Ke <ke.yu@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Keir Fraser committed 2009-12-14 07:54:53 +00:00
1 parent 018b6522ce
commit 3535332327
5 files changed
+200 -34

No files matched your search

+187 -34
View File
@@ -30,23 +30,147 @@
#include <xen/acpi.h>
#include <xen/timer.h>
#include <xen/cpuidle.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#define BREAK_FUZZ 4 /* 4 us */
#define PRED_HISTORY_PCT 50
#define USEC_PER_SEC 1000000
#define BUCKETS 6
#define RESOLUTION 1024
#define DECAY 4
#define MAX_INTERESTING 50000
/*
* Concepts and ideas behind the menu governor
*
* For the menu governor, there are 3 decision factors for picking a C
* state:
* 1) Energy break even point
* 2) Performance impact
* 3) Latency tolerance (TBD: from guest virtual C state)
* These these three factors are treated independently.
*
* Energy break even point
* -----------------------
* C state entry and exit have an energy cost, and a certain amount of time in
* the C state is required to actually break even on this cost. CPUIDLE
* provides us this duration in the "target_residency" field. So all that we
* need is a good prediction of how long we'll be idle. Like the traditional
* menu governor, we start with the actual known "next timer event" time.
*
* Since there are other source of wakeups (interrupts for example) than
* the next timer event, this estimation is rather optimistic. To get a
* more realistic estimate, a correction factor is applied to the estimate,
* that is based on historic behavior. For example, if in the past the actual
* duration always was 50% of the next timer tick, the correction factor will
* be 0.5.
*
* menu uses a running average for this correction factor, however it uses a
* set of factors, not just a single factor. This stems from the realization
* that the ratio is dependent on the order of magnitude of the expected
* duration; if we expect 500 milliseconds of idle time the likelihood of
* getting an interrupt very early is much higher than if we expect 50 micro
* seconds of idle time.
* For this reason we keep an array of 6 independent factors, that gets
* indexed based on the magnitude of the expected duration
*
* Limiting Performance Impact
* ---------------------------
* C states, especially those with large exit latencies, can have a real
* noticable impact on workloads, which is not acceptable for most sysadmins,
* and in addition, less performance has a power price of its own.
*
* As a general rule of thumb, menu assumes that the following heuristic
* holds:
* The busier the system, the less impact of C states is acceptable
*
* This rule-of-thumb is implemented using average interrupt interval:
* If the exit latency times multiplier is longer than the average
* interrupt interval, the C state is not considered a candidate
* for selection due to a too high performance impact. So the smaller
* the average interrupt interval is, the smaller C state latency should be
* and thus the less likely a busy CPU will hit such a deep C state.
*
*/
struct perf_factor{
s_time_t time_stamp;
s_time_t duration;
unsigned int irq_count_stamp;
unsigned int irq_sum;
};
struct menu_device
{
int last_state_idx;
unsigned int expected_us;
unsigned int predicted_us;
unsigned int current_predicted_us;
unsigned int last_measured_us;
unsigned int elapsed_us;
u64 predicted_us;
unsigned int measured_us;
unsigned int exit_us;
unsigned int bucket;
u64 correction_factor[BUCKETS];
struct perf_factor pf;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);
static inline int which_bucket(unsigned int duration)
{
int bucket = 0;
if (duration < 10)
return bucket;
if (duration < 100)
return bucket + 1;
if (duration < 1000)
return bucket + 2;
if (duration < 10000)
return bucket + 3;
if (duration < 100000)
return bucket + 4;
return bucket + 5;
}
/*
* Return the average interrupt interval to take I/O performance
* requirements into account. The smaller the average interrupt
* interval to be, the more busy I/O activity, and thus the higher
* the barrier to go to an expensive C state.
*/
/* 5 milisec sampling period */
#define SAMPLING_PERIOD 5000000
/* for I/O interrupt, we give 8x multiplier compared to C state latency*/
#define IO_MULTIPLIER 8
static inline s_time_t avg_intr_interval_us(void)
{
struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
s_time_t duration, now;
s_time_t avg_interval;
unsigned int irq_sum;
now = NOW();
duration = (data->pf.duration + (now - data->pf.time_stamp)
* (DECAY - 1)) / DECAY;
irq_sum = (data->pf.irq_sum + (this_cpu(irq_count) - data->pf.irq_count_stamp)
* (DECAY - 1)) / DECAY;
if (irq_sum == 0)
/* no irq recently, so return a big enough interval: 1 sec */
avg_interval = 1000000;
else
avg_interval = duration / irq_sum / 1000; /* in us */
if ( duration >= SAMPLING_PERIOD){
data->pf.time_stamp = now;
data->pf.duration = duration;
data->pf.irq_count_stamp= this_cpu(irq_count);
data->pf.irq_sum = irq_sum;
}
return avg_interval;
}
static unsigned int get_sleep_length_us(void)
{
s_time_t us = (this_cpu(timer_deadline_start) - NOW()) / 1000;
@@ -62,57 +186,86 @@ static int menu_select(struct acpi_processor_power *power)
{
struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
int i;
s_time_t io_interval;
/* determine the expected residency time */
/* TBD: Change to 0 if C0(polling mode) support is added later*/
data->last_state_idx = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START;
data->exit_us = 0;
/* determine the expected residency time, round up */
data->expected_us = get_sleep_length_us();
/* Recalculate predicted_us based on prediction_history_pct */
data->predicted_us *= PRED_HISTORY_PCT;
data->predicted_us += (100 - PRED_HISTORY_PCT) *
data->current_predicted_us;
data->predicted_us /= 100;
data->bucket = which_bucket(data->expected_us);
io_interval = avg_intr_interval_us();
/*
* if the correction factor is 0 (eg first time init or cpu hotplug
* etc), we actually want to start out with a unity factor.
*/
if (data->correction_factor[data->bucket] == 0)
data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = RESOLUTION * DECAY;
/* Make sure to round up for half microseconds */
data->predicted_us = DIV_ROUND(
data->expected_us * data->correction_factor[data->bucket],
RESOLUTION * DECAY);
/* find the deepest idle state that satisfies our constraints */
for ( i = 2; i < power->count; i++ )
for ( i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START + 1; i < power->count; i++ )
{
struct acpi_processor_cx *s = &power->states[i];
if ( s->target_residency > data->expected_us + s->latency )
if (s->target_residency > data->predicted_us)
break;
if ( s->target_residency > data->predicted_us )
if (s->latency * IO_MULTIPLIER > io_interval)
break;
/* TBD: we need to check the QoS requirment in future */
data->exit_us = s->latency;
data->last_state_idx = i;
}
data->last_state_idx = i - 1;
return i - 1;
return data->last_state_idx;
}
static void menu_reflect(struct acpi_processor_power *power)
{
struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
struct acpi_processor_cx *target = &power->states[data->last_state_idx];
unsigned int last_residency;
unsigned int last_idle_us = power->last_residency;
unsigned int measured_us;
u64 new_factor;
last_residency = power->last_residency;
measured_us = last_residency + data->elapsed_us;
measured_us = last_idle_us;
/* if wrapping, set to max uint (-1) */
measured_us = data->elapsed_us <= measured_us ? measured_us : -1;
/*
* We correct for the exit latency; we are assuming here that the
* exit latency happens after the event that we're interested in.
*/
if (measured_us > data->exit_us)
measured_us -= data->exit_us;
/* Predict time remaining until next break event */
data->current_predicted_us = max(measured_us, data->last_measured_us);
/* update our correction ratio */
/* Distinguish between expected & non-expected events */
if ( last_residency + BREAK_FUZZ
< data->expected_us + target->latency )
{
data->last_measured_us = measured_us;
data->elapsed_us = 0;
}
new_factor = data->correction_factor[data->bucket]
* (DECAY - 1) / DECAY;
if (data->expected_us > 0 && data->measured_us < MAX_INTERESTING)
new_factor += RESOLUTION * measured_us / data->expected_us;
else
data->elapsed_us = measured_us;
/*
* we were idle so long that we count it as a perfect
* prediction
*/
new_factor += RESOLUTION;
/*
* We don't want 0 as factor; we always want at least
* a tiny bit of estimated time.
*/
if (new_factor == 0)
new_factor = 1;
data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = new_factor;
}
static int menu_enable_device(struct acpi_processor_power *power)
+5
View File
@@ -211,6 +211,9 @@ static void hpet_interrupt_handler(int irq, void *data,
struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
{
struct hpet_event_channel *ch = (struct hpet_event_channel *)data;
this_cpu(irq_count)--;
if ( !ch->event_handler )
{
printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Spurious HPET timer interrupt on HPET timer %d\n", ch->idx);
@@ -692,6 +695,8 @@ int hpet_broadcast_is_available(void)
int hpet_legacy_irq_tick(void)
{
this_cpu(irq_count)--;
if ( !legacy_hpet_event.event_handler )
return 0;
legacy_hpet_event.event_handler(&legacy_hpet_event);
+4
View File
@@ -517,6 +517,8 @@ void irq_set_affinity(int irq, cpumask_t mask)
cpus_copy(desc->pending_mask, mask);
}
DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count);
asmlinkage void do_IRQ(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
{
struct irqaction *action;
@@ -528,6 +530,8 @@ asmlinkage void do_IRQ(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
perfc_incr(irqs);
this_cpu(irq_count)++;
if (irq < 0) {
ack_APIC_irq();
printk("%s: %d.%d No irq handler for vector (irq %d)\n",
+2
View File
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ extern unsigned long io_apic_irqs;
extern atomic_t irq_err_count;
extern atomic_t irq_mis_count;
DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count);
int pirq_shared(struct domain *d , int irq);
int map_domain_pirq(struct domain *d, int pirq, int irq, int type,
+2
View File
@@ -86,4 +86,6 @@ struct cpuidle_governor
extern struct cpuidle_governor *cpuidle_current_governor;
void cpuidle_disable_deep_cstate(void);
#define CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START 1
#endif /* _XEN_CPUIDLE_H */
Reference in new issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.