xen/docs/misra/safe.json

{
    "version": "1.0",
    "content": [
        {
            "id": "SAF-0-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R8.6",
                "coverity": "misra_c_2012_rule_8_6_violation"
            },
            "name": "Rule 8.6: linker script defined symbols",
            "text": "It is safe to declare this symbol because it is defined in the linker script."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-1-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R8.4"
            },
            "name": "Rule 8.4: asm-only definition",
            "text": "Functions and variables used only by asm modules do not need to have a visible declaration prior to their definition."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-2-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R10.1"
            },
            "name": "MC3A2.R10.1: use of an enumeration constant in an arithmetic operation",
            "text": "This violation can be fixed with a cast to (int) of the enumeration constant, but a deviation was chosen due to code readability (see also the comment in BITS_TO_LONGS)."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-3-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R20.4"
            },
            "name": "MC3A2.R20.4: allow the definition of a macro with the same name as a keyword in some special cases",
            "text": "The definition of a macro with the same name as a keyword can be useful in certain configurations to improve the guarantees that can be provided by Xen. See docs/misra/deviations.rst for a precise rationale for all such cases."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-4-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R17.1"
            },
            "name": "Rule 17.1: internal helper functions made to break long running hypercalls into multiple calls.",
            "text": "They need to take a variable number of arguments depending on the original hypercall they are trying to continue."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-5-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R16.2"
            },
            "name": "MC3A2.R16.2: using a case label when the most closely-enclosing compound statement is not a switch statement",
            "text": "A switch label enclosed by some compound statement that is not the body of a switch is permitted within local helper macros that are unlikely to be misused or misunderstood."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-6-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R20.12"
            },
            "name": "MC3A2.R20.12: use of a macro argument that deliberately violates the Rule",
            "text": "A macro parameter that is itself a macro is intentionally used within the macro both as a regular parameter and for text replacement."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-7-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R20.7"
            },
            "name": "MC3A2.R20.7: deliberately non-parenthesized macro argument",
            "text": "A macro parameter expands to an expression that is non-parenthesized, as doing so would break the functionality."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-8-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.D4.10"
            },
            "name": "Dir 4.10: headers that leave it up to the caller to include them correctly",
            "text": "Headers that deliberatively leave the responsability of their correct inclusion to the caller are allowed."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-9-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.D4.10"
            },
            "name": "Dir 4.10: empty headers",
            "text": "Empty headers pose no risk if included more than once."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-10-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.D4.10"
            },
            "name": "Dir 4.10: direct inclusion guard before",
            "text": "Headers with just the direct inclusion guard before the inclusion guard are safe."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-11-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R16.6"
            },
            "name": "Rule 16.6: single clause due to kconfig",
            "text": "A switch statement with a single switch clause because other switch clauses are disabled in a given kconfig is safe."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-12-safe",
            "analyser": {
                "eclair": "MC3A2.R16.6"
            },
            "name": "Rule 16.6: single clause due to future expansion",
            "text": "A switch statement with a single switch clause to purposely enable future additions of new cases is safe."
        },
        {
            "id": "SAF-13-safe",
            "analyser": {},
            "name": "Sentinel",
            "text": "Next ID to be used"
        }
    ]
}