xen/linux-2.4-xen-sparse/include/linux/timer.h

#ifndef _LINUX_TIMER_H
#define _LINUX_TIMER_H

#include <linux/config.h>
#include <linux/list.h>

/*
 * In Linux 2.4, static timers have been removed from the kernel.
 * Timers may be dynamically created and destroyed, and should be initialized
 * by a call to init_timer() upon creation.
 *
 * The "data" field enables use of a common timeout function for several
 * timeouts. You can use this field to distinguish between the different
 * invocations.
 */
struct timer_list {
	struct list_head list;
	unsigned long expires;
	unsigned long data;
	void (*function)(unsigned long);
};

extern void add_timer(struct timer_list * timer);
extern int del_timer(struct timer_list * timer);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ
extern struct timer_list *next_timer_event(void);
#endif

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern int del_timer_sync(struct timer_list * timer);
extern void sync_timers(void);
#else
#define del_timer_sync(t)	del_timer(t)
#define sync_timers()		do { } while (0)
#endif

/*
 * mod_timer is a more efficient way to update the expire field of an
 * active timer (if the timer is inactive it will be activated)
 * mod_timer(a,b) is equivalent to del_timer(a); a->expires = b; add_timer(a).
 * If the timer is known to be not pending (ie, in the handler), mod_timer
 * is less efficient than a->expires = b; add_timer(a).
 */
int mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires);

extern void it_real_fn(unsigned long);

static inline void init_timer(struct timer_list * timer)
{
	timer->list.next = timer->list.prev = NULL;
}

static inline int timer_pending (const struct timer_list * timer)
{
	return timer->list.next != NULL;
}

/*
 *	These inlines deal with timer wrapping correctly. You are 
 *	strongly encouraged to use them
 *	1. Because people otherwise forget
 *	2. Because if the timer wrap changes in future you wont have to
 *	   alter your driver code.
 *
 * time_after(a,b) returns true if the time a is after time b.
 *
 * Do this with "<0" and ">=0" to only test the sign of the result. A
 * good compiler would generate better code (and a really good compiler
 * wouldn't care). Gcc is currently neither.
 */
#define time_after(a,b)		((long)(b) - (long)(a) < 0)
#define time_before(a,b)	time_after(b,a)

#define time_after_eq(a,b)	((long)(a) - (long)(b) >= 0)
#define time_before_eq(a,b)	time_after_eq(b,a)

#endif