Files
xen/tools/libs/light/libxl_numa.c
T
Juergen Gross 41aea82de2 tools/libxl: move libxenlight to tools/libs/light
Carve out all libxenlight related sources and move them to
tools/libs/light in order to use the generic library build environment.

The closely related sources for libxl-save-helper and the libxl test
environment are being moved, too.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Acked-by: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
2020-10-01 13:26:09 +02:00

536 lines
20 KiB
C

/*
* Copyright (C) 2012 Citrix Ltd.
* Author Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published
* by the Free Software Foundation; version 2.1 only. with the special
* exception on linking described in file LICENSE.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.
*/
#include "libxl_osdeps.h" /* must come before any other headers */
#include <glob.h>
#include "libxl_internal.h"
/*
* What follows are helpers for generating all the k-combinations
* without repetitions of a set S with n elements in it. Formally
* speaking, they are subsets of k distinct elements of S and, if
* S is n elements big, the number of k-combinations is equal to the
* binomial coefficient C(n k)=n!/(k! * (n - k)!).
*
* The various subset are generated one after the other by calling
* comb_init() first, and, after that, comb_next()
* C(n k)-1 times. An iterator is used to store the current status
* of the whole generation operation (i.e., basically, the last
* combination that has been generated). As soon as all combinations
* have been generated, comb_next() will start returning 0 instead of
* 1. The same instance of the iterator and the same values for
* n and k _must_ be used for each call (if that doesn't happen, the
* result is unspecified).
*
* The algorithm is a well known one (see, for example, D. Knuth's "The
* Art of Computer Programming - Volume 4, Fascicle 3" and it produces
* the combinations in such a way that they (well, more precisely, their
* indexes it the array/map representing the set) come with lexicographic
* ordering.
*
* For example, with n = 5 and k = 3, calling comb_init()
* will generate { 0, 1, 2 }, while subsequent valid calls to
* comb_next() will produce the following:
* { { 0, 1, 3 }, { 0, 1, 4 },
* { 0, 2, 3 }, { 0, 2, 4 }, { 0, 3, 4 },
* { 1, 2, 3 }, { 1, 2, 4 }, { 1, 3, 4 },
* { 2, 3, 4 } }
*
* This is used by the automatic NUMA placement logic below.
*/
typedef int* comb_iter_t;
static int comb_init(libxl__gc *gc, comb_iter_t *it, int n, int k)
{
comb_iter_t new_iter;
int i;
if (n < k)
return 0;
/* First set is always { 0, 1, 2, ..., k-1 } */
GCNEW_ARRAY(new_iter, k);
for (i = 0; i < k; i++)
new_iter[i] = i;
*it = new_iter;
return 1;
}
static int comb_next(comb_iter_t it, int n, int k)
{
int i;
/*
* The idea here is to find the leftmost element from where
* we should start incrementing the indexes of the iterator.
* This means looking for the highest index that can be increased
* while still producing value smaller than n-1. In the example
* above, when dealing with { 0, 1, 4 }, such an element is the
* second one, as the third is already equal to 4 (which actually
* is n-1).
* Once we found from where to start, we increment that element
* and override the right-hand rest of the iterator with its
* successors, thus achieving lexicographic ordering.
*
* Regarding the termination of the generation process, when we
* manage in bringing n-k at the very first position of the iterator,
* we know that is the last valid combination ( { 2, 3, 4 }, with
* n - k = 5 - 2 = 2, in the example above), and thus we start
* returning 0 as soon as we cross that border.
*/
for (i = k - 1; it[i] == n - k + i; i--) {
if (i <= 0)
return 0;
}
for (it[i]++, i++; i < k; i++)
it[i] = it[i - 1] + 1;
return 1;
}
/* NUMA automatic placement (see libxl_internal.h for details) */
/*
* This function turns a k-combination iterator into a node map,
* given another map, telling us which nodes should be considered.
*
* This means the bits that are set in suitable_nodemap and that
* corresponds to the indexes of the given combination are the ones
* that will be set in nodemap.
*
* For example, given a fully set suitable_nodemap, if the iterator
* represents the combination { 0, 2, 4}, nodmeap will have bits #0,
* #2 and #4 set.
* On the other hand, if, say, suitable_nodemap=01011011, the same
* iterator will cause bits #1, #4 and #7 of nodemap to be set.
*/
static void comb_get_nodemap(comb_iter_t it, libxl_bitmap *suitable_nodemap,
libxl_bitmap *nodemap, int k)
{
int i, m = 0, n = 0;
libxl_bitmap_set_none(nodemap);
libxl_for_each_set_bit(i, *suitable_nodemap) {
/* Check wether the n-th set bit of suitable_nodemap
* matches with the m-th element of the iterator (and,
* only if it does, advance to the next one) */
if (m < k && n == it[m]) {
libxl_bitmap_set(nodemap, i);
m++;
}
n++;
}
}
/* Retrieve the number of cpus that the nodes that are part of the nodemap
* span and are also set in suitable_cpumap. */
static int nodemap_to_nr_cpus(libxl_cputopology *tinfo, int nr_cpus,
const libxl_bitmap *suitable_cpumap,
const libxl_bitmap *nodemap)
{
int i, nodes_cpus = 0;
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
if (libxl_bitmap_test(suitable_cpumap, i) &&
libxl_bitmap_test(nodemap, tinfo[i].node))
nodes_cpus++;
}
return nodes_cpus;
}
/* Retrieve the amount of free memory within the nodemap */
static uint32_t nodemap_to_free_memkb(libxl_numainfo *ninfo,
libxl_bitmap *nodemap)
{
uint32_t free_memkb = 0;
int i;
libxl_for_each_set_bit(i, *nodemap)
free_memkb += ninfo[i].free / 1024;
return free_memkb;
}
/* Retrieve the number of vcpus able to run on the nodes in nodemap */
static int nodemap_to_nr_vcpus(libxl__gc *gc, int vcpus_on_node[],
const libxl_bitmap *nodemap)
{
int i, nr_vcpus = 0;
libxl_for_each_set_bit(i, *nodemap)
nr_vcpus += vcpus_on_node[i];
return nr_vcpus;
}
/* Number of vcpus able to run on the cpus of the various nodes
* (reported by filling the array vcpus_on_node[]). */
static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_cputopology *tinfo,
size_t tinfo_elements,
const libxl_bitmap *suitable_cpumap,
int vcpus_on_node[])
{
libxl_dominfo *dinfo = NULL;
libxl_bitmap dom_nodemap, nodes_counted;
int nr_doms, nr_cpus;
int i, j, k;
dinfo = libxl_list_domain(CTX, &nr_doms);
if (dinfo == NULL)
return ERROR_FAIL;
if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &nodes_counted, 0) < 0) {
libxl_dominfo_list_free(dinfo, nr_doms);
return ERROR_FAIL;
}
if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &dom_nodemap, 0) < 0) {
libxl_bitmap_dispose(&nodes_counted);
libxl_dominfo_list_free(dinfo, nr_doms);
return ERROR_FAIL;
}
for (i = 0; i < nr_doms; i++) {
libxl_vcpuinfo *vinfo = NULL;
int nr_dom_vcpus = 0;
libxl_cpupoolinfo cpupool_info;
int cpupool;
libxl_cpupoolinfo_init(&cpupool_info);
cpupool = libxl__domain_cpupool(gc, dinfo[i].domid);
if (cpupool < 0)
goto next;
if (libxl_cpupool_info(CTX, &cpupool_info, cpupool))
goto next;
vinfo = libxl_list_vcpu(CTX, dinfo[i].domid, &nr_dom_vcpus, &nr_cpus);
if (vinfo == NULL)
goto next;
/* Retrieve the domain's node-affinity map */
libxl_domain_get_nodeaffinity(CTX, dinfo[i].domid, &dom_nodemap);
for (j = 0; j < nr_dom_vcpus; j++) {
/*
* For each vcpu of each domain, it must have both vcpu-affinity
* and node-affinity to (a pcpu belonging to) a certain node to
* cause an increment in the corresponding element of the array.
*
* Note that we also need to check whether the cpu actually
* belongs to the domain's cpupool (the cpupool of the domain
* being checked). In fact, it could be that the vcpu has affinity
* with cpus in suitable_cpumask, but that are not in its own
* cpupool, and we don't want to consider those!
*/
libxl_bitmap_set_none(&nodes_counted);
libxl_for_each_set_bit(k, vinfo[j].cpumap) {
if (k >= tinfo_elements)
break;
int node = tinfo[k].node;
if (libxl_bitmap_test(suitable_cpumap, k) &&
libxl_bitmap_test(&cpupool_info.cpumap, k) &&
libxl_bitmap_test(&dom_nodemap, node) &&
!libxl_bitmap_test(&nodes_counted, node)) {
libxl_bitmap_set(&nodes_counted, node);
vcpus_on_node[node]++;
}
}
}
next:
libxl_cpupoolinfo_dispose(&cpupool_info);
libxl_vcpuinfo_list_free(vinfo, nr_dom_vcpus);
}
libxl_bitmap_dispose(&dom_nodemap);
libxl_bitmap_dispose(&nodes_counted);
libxl_dominfo_list_free(dinfo, nr_doms);
return 0;
}
/*
* This function tries to figure out if the host has a consistent number
* of cpus along all its NUMA nodes. In fact, if that is the case, we can
* calculate the minimum number of nodes needed for a domain by just
* dividing its total number of vcpus by this value computed here.
* However, we are not allowed to assume that all the nodes have the
* same number of cpus. Therefore, in case discrepancies among different
* nodes are found, this function just returns 0, for the caller to know
* it shouldn't rely on this 'optimization', and sort out things in some
* other way (by doing something basic, like starting trying with
* candidates with just one node).
*/
static int count_cpus_per_node(libxl_cputopology *tinfo, int nr_cpus,
int nr_nodes)
{
int cpus_per_node = 0;
int j, i;
/* This makes sense iff # of PCPUs is the same for all nodes */
for (j = 0; j < nr_nodes; j++) {
int curr_cpus = 0;
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
if (tinfo[i].node == j)
curr_cpus++;
}
/* So, if the above does not hold, turn the whole thing off! */
cpus_per_node = cpus_per_node == 0 ? curr_cpus : cpus_per_node;
if (cpus_per_node != curr_cpus)
return 0;
}
return cpus_per_node;
}
/*
* Looks for the placement candidates that satisfyies some specific
* conditions and return the best one according to the provided
* comparison function.
*/
int libxl__get_numa_candidate(libxl__gc *gc,
uint64_t min_free_memkb, int min_cpus,
int min_nodes, int max_nodes,
const libxl_bitmap *suitable_cpumap,
libxl__numa_candidate_cmpf numa_cmpf,
libxl__numa_candidate *cndt_out,
int *cndt_found)
{
libxl__numa_candidate new_cndt;
libxl_cputopology *tinfo = NULL;
libxl_numainfo *ninfo = NULL;
int nr_nodes = 0, nr_suit_nodes, nr_cpus = 0;
libxl_bitmap suitable_nodemap, nodemap;
int *vcpus_on_node, rc = 0;
libxl_bitmap_init(&nodemap);
libxl_bitmap_init(&suitable_nodemap);
libxl__numa_candidate_init(&new_cndt);
/* Get platform info and prepare the map for testing the combinations */
ninfo = libxl_get_numainfo(CTX, &nr_nodes);
if (ninfo == NULL)
return ERROR_FAIL;
if (nr_nodes <= 1) {
*cndt_found = 0;
goto out;
}
GCNEW_ARRAY(vcpus_on_node, nr_nodes);
/*
* The good thing about this solution is that it is based on heuristics
* (implemented in numa_cmpf() ), but we at least can evaluate it on
* all the possible placement candidates. That can happen because the
* number of nodes present in current NUMA systems is quite small.
* In fact, even if a sum of binomials is involved, if the system has
* up to 16 nodes it "only" takes 65535 steps. This is fine, as the
* number of nodes the biggest NUMA systems provide at the time of this
* writing is 8 (and it will probably continue to be so for a while).
* However, computanional complexity would explode on systems bigger
* than that, and it's really important we avoid trying to run this
* on monsters with 32, 64 or more nodes (if they ever pop into being).
* Therefore, here it comes a safety catch that disables the algorithm
* for the cases when it wouldn't work well.
*/
if (nr_nodes > 16) {
/* Log we did nothing and return 0, as no real error occurred */
LOG(WARN, "System has %d NUMA nodes, which is too big for the "
"placement algorithm to work effectively: skipping it. "
"Consider manually pinning the vCPUs and/or looking at "
"cpupools for manually partitioning the system.",
nr_nodes);
*cndt_found = 0;
goto out;
}
tinfo = libxl_get_cpu_topology(CTX, &nr_cpus);
if (tinfo == NULL) {
rc = ERROR_FAIL;
goto out;
}
rc = libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &nodemap, 0);
if (rc)
goto out;
rc = libxl__numa_candidate_alloc(gc, &new_cndt);
if (rc)
goto out;
/* Allocate and prepare the map of the node that can be utilized for
* placement, basing on the map of suitable cpus. */
rc = libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &suitable_nodemap, 0);
if (rc)
goto out;
rc = libxl_cpumap_to_nodemap(CTX, suitable_cpumap, &suitable_nodemap);
if (rc)
goto out;
/*
* Later on, we will try to figure out how many vcpus are runnable on
* each candidate (as a part of choosing the best one of them). That
* requires going through all the vcpus of all the domains and check
* their affinities. So, instead of doing that for each candidate,
* let's count here the number of vcpus runnable on each node, so that
* all we have to do later is summing up the right elements of the
* vcpus_on_node array.
*/
rc = nr_vcpus_on_nodes(gc, tinfo, nr_cpus, suitable_cpumap, vcpus_on_node);
if (rc)
goto out;
/*
* If the minimum number of NUMA nodes is not explicitly specified
* (i.e., min_nodes == 0), we try to figure out a sensible number of nodes
* from where to start generating candidates, if possible (or just start
* from 1 otherwise). The maximum number of nodes should not exceed the
* number of existent NUMA nodes on the host, or the candidate generation
* won't work properly.
*/
if (!min_nodes) {
int cpus_per_node;
cpus_per_node = count_cpus_per_node(tinfo, nr_cpus, nr_nodes);
if (cpus_per_node == 0)
min_nodes = 1;
else
min_nodes = (min_cpus + cpus_per_node - 1) / cpus_per_node;
}
/* We also need to be sure we do not exceed the number of
* nodes we are allowed to use. */
nr_suit_nodes = libxl_bitmap_count_set(&suitable_nodemap);
if (min_nodes > nr_suit_nodes)
min_nodes = nr_suit_nodes;
if (!max_nodes || max_nodes > nr_suit_nodes)
max_nodes = nr_suit_nodes;
if (min_nodes > max_nodes) {
LOG(ERROR, "Inconsistent minimum or maximum number of guest nodes");
rc = ERROR_INVAL;
goto out;
}
/* This is up to the caller to be disposed */
rc = libxl__numa_candidate_alloc(gc, cndt_out);
if (rc)
goto out;
/*
* Consider all the combinations with sizes in [min_nodes, max_nodes]
* (see comb_init() and comb_next()). Note that, since the fewer the
* number of nodes the better, it is guaranteed that any candidate
* found during the i-eth step will be better than any other one we
* could find during the (i+1)-eth and all the subsequent steps (they
* all will have more nodes). It's thus pointless to keep going if
* we already found something.
*/
*cndt_found = 0;
while (min_nodes <= max_nodes && *cndt_found == 0) {
comb_iter_t comb_iter;
int comb_ok;
/*
* And here it is. Each step of this cycle generates a combination of
* nodes as big as min_nodes mandates. Each of these combinations is
* checked against the constraints provided by the caller (namely,
* amount of free memory and number of cpus) and it can concur to
* become our best placement iff it passes the check.
*/
for (comb_ok = comb_init(gc, &comb_iter, nr_suit_nodes, min_nodes);
comb_ok;
comb_ok = comb_next(comb_iter, nr_suit_nodes, min_nodes)) {
uint64_t nodes_free_memkb;
int nodes_cpus;
/* Get the nodemap for the combination, only considering
* suitable nodes. */
comb_get_nodemap(comb_iter, &suitable_nodemap,
&nodemap, min_nodes);
/* If there is not enough memory in this combination, skip it
* and go generating the next one... */
nodes_free_memkb = nodemap_to_free_memkb(ninfo, &nodemap);
if (min_free_memkb && nodes_free_memkb < min_free_memkb)
continue;
/* And the same applies if this combination is short in cpus */
nodes_cpus = nodemap_to_nr_cpus(tinfo, nr_cpus, suitable_cpumap,
&nodemap);
if (min_cpus && nodes_cpus < min_cpus)
continue;
/*
* Conditions are met, we can compare this candidate with the
* current best one (if any).
*/
libxl__numa_candidate_put_nodemap(gc, &new_cndt, &nodemap);
new_cndt.nr_vcpus = nodemap_to_nr_vcpus(gc, vcpus_on_node,
&nodemap);
new_cndt.free_memkb = nodes_free_memkb;
new_cndt.nr_nodes = libxl_bitmap_count_set(&nodemap);
new_cndt.nr_cpus = nodes_cpus;
/*
* Check if the new candidate we is better the what we found up
* to now by means of the comparison function. If no comparison
* function is provided, just return as soon as we find our first
* candidate.
*/
if (*cndt_found == 0 || numa_cmpf(&new_cndt, cndt_out) < 0) {
*cndt_found = 1;
LOG(DEBUG, "New best NUMA placement candidate found: "
"nr_nodes=%d, nr_cpus=%d, nr_vcpus=%d, "
"free_memkb=%"PRIu64"", new_cndt.nr_nodes,
new_cndt.nr_cpus, new_cndt.nr_vcpus,
new_cndt.free_memkb / 1024);
libxl__numa_candidate_put_nodemap(gc, cndt_out, &nodemap);
cndt_out->nr_vcpus = new_cndt.nr_vcpus;
cndt_out->free_memkb = new_cndt.free_memkb;
cndt_out->nr_nodes = new_cndt.nr_nodes;
cndt_out->nr_cpus = new_cndt.nr_cpus;
if (numa_cmpf == NULL)
break;
}
}
min_nodes++;
}
if (*cndt_found == 0)
LOG(NOTICE, "NUMA placement failed, performance might be affected");
out:
libxl_bitmap_dispose(&nodemap);
libxl_bitmap_dispose(&suitable_nodemap);
libxl__numa_candidate_dispose(&new_cndt);
libxl_numainfo_list_free(ninfo, nr_nodes);
libxl_cputopology_list_free(tinfo, nr_cpus);
return rc;
}
/*
* Local variables:
* mode: C
* c-basic-offset: 4
* indent-tabs-mode: nil
* End:
*/