ns16550: correct name/value pair parsing for PCI port/bridge

First of all these were inverted: "bridge=" caused the port coordinates
to be established, while "port=" controlled the bridge coordinates. And
then the error messages being identical also wasn't helpful. While
correcting this also move both case blocks close together.

Fixes: 97fd49a7e0 ("ns16550: add support for UART parameters to be specifed with name-value pairs")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
master commit: e692b22230
master date: 2023-03-29 14:55:37 +0200

xen/drivers/char/ns16550.c

@@ -1536,13 +1536,6 @@ static bool __init parse_namevalue_pairs(char *str, struct ns16550 *uart)
             break;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI
-        case bridge_bdf:
-            if ( !parse_pci(param_value, NULL, &uart->ps_bdf[0],
-                            &uart->ps_bdf[1], &uart->ps_bdf[2]) )
-                PARSE_ERR_RET("Bad port PCI coordinates\n");
-            uart->ps_bdf_enable = true;
-            break;
-
         case device:
             if ( strncmp(param_value, "pci", 3) == 0 )
             {
@@ -1557,9 +1550,16 @@ static bool __init parse_namevalue_pairs(char *str, struct ns16550 *uart)
             break;
 
         case port_bdf:
+            if ( !parse_pci(param_value, NULL, &uart->ps_bdf[0],
+                            &uart->ps_bdf[1], &uart->ps_bdf[2]) )
+                PARSE_ERR_RET("Bad port PCI coordinates\n");
+            uart->ps_bdf_enable = true;
+            break;
+
+        case bridge_bdf:
             if ( !parse_pci(param_value, NULL, &uart->pb_bdf[0],
                             &uart->pb_bdf[1], &uart->pb_bdf[2]) )
-                PARSE_ERR_RET("Bad port PCI coordinates\n");
+                PARSE_ERR_RET("Bad bridge PCI coordinates\n");
             uart->pb_bdf_enable = true;
             break;
 #endif