x86/spec-ctrl: Software BHB-clearing sequences

Implement clear_bhb_{tsx,loops}() as per the BHI guidance.  The loops variant
is set up as the "short" sequence.

Introduce SCF_entry_bhb and extend SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY_* with a conditional call
to selected clearing routine.

Note that due to a limitation in the ALTERNATIVE capability, the TEST/JZ can't
be included alongside a CALL in a single alternative block.  This is going to
require further work to untangle.

The BHB sequences (if used) must be after the restoration of Xen's
MSR_SPEC_CTRL value, which must be accounted for when judging whether it is
safe to skip the safety LFENCEs.

This is part of XSA-456 / CVE-2024-2201.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
(cherry picked from commit 954c983abc)
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cooper committed 2024-04-09 17:16:32 +01:00
1 parent 041f939e13
commit 3419b2a8fd
8 files changed
+171 -18

No files matched your search

+1
View File
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ alternative-y := alternative.init.o
alternative-$(CONFIG_LIVEPATCH) :=
obj-bin-y += $(alternative-y)
obj-y += apic.o
obj-y += bhb-thunk.o
obj-y += bitops.o
obj-bin-y += bzimage.init.o
obj-bin-y += clear_page.o
+98
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
/*
* Branch History Injection clearing sequences.
*
* https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/branch-history-injection.html
*
* Copyright (c) 2023, 2024 XenServer.
*/
.file __FILE__
#include <asm/asm_defns.h>
.section .text.entry, "ax", @progbits
/*
* Clear the Branch History Buffer using a TSX Abort.
*
* Any TSX Abort has a side effect of clearing the BHB, even when TSX is
* disabled for e.g. TAA mitigation reasons.
*/
ENTRY(clear_bhb_tsx)
.byte 0xc7, 0xf8; .long 1f - 0f /* xbegin 1f */
0: .byte 0xc6, 0xf8, 0 /* xabort $0 */
int3
1:
ret
.size clear_bhb_tsx, . - clear_bhb_tsx
.type clear_bhb_tsx, @function
/*
* Clear the Branch History Buffer using the software sequence.
*
* Clobbers: %eax, %ecx
*
* This executes a specific number of taken branches, sufficient to displace
* all prior entries in the history tracker, therefore removing prior
* influence on subsequent BTB lookups.
*
* Structurally, it looks like this:
*
* call 1
* call 2
* ... 5x jmp loop
* call 2
* ... 5x jmp loop
* ... 5x call2's deep
*
* ret
* ret
* ret
* ret
*
* The CALL/RETs are necessary to prevent the Loop Stream Detector from
* interfering. The alignment is for performance and not safety.
*
* The "short" sequence (5 and 5) is for CPUs prior to Alder Lake / Sapphire
* Rapids (i.e. Cores prior to Golden Cove and/or Gracemont).
*/
ENTRY(clear_bhb_loops)
mov $5, %ecx
call 1f
jmp 5f
int3
.align 64
1: call 2f
ret
int3
.align 64
2: mov $5, %eax
3: jmp 4f
int3
4: sub $1, %eax
jnz 3b
sub $1, %ecx
jnz 1b
ret
5:
/*
* The Intel sequence has an LFENCE here. The purpose is to ensure
* that all prior branches have executed, before dispatching a
* subsequent indirect branch.
*
* Xen's SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY_* blocks have safety LFENCEs at the end when
* protections are active, which suffices for this purpose.
*/
ret
.size clear_bhb_loops, . - clear_bhb_loops
.type clear_bhb_loops, @function
+12
View File
@@ -57,6 +57,18 @@ ENTRY(vmx_asm_vmexit_handler)
wrmsr
.endm
ALTERNATIVE "", restore_spec_ctrl, X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_HVM
/*
* Clear the BHB to mitigate BHI. Used on eIBRS parts, and uses RETs
* itself so must be after we've perfomed all the RET-safety we can.
*/
testb $SCF_entry_bhb, CPUINFO_scf(%rsp)
jz .L_skip_bhb
ALTERNATIVE_2 "", \
"call clear_bhb_loops", X86_SPEC_BHB_LOOPS, \
"call clear_bhb_tsx", X86_SPEC_BHB_TSX
.L_skip_bhb:
ALTERNATIVE "lfence", "", X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_VMX
/* WARNING! `ret`, `call *`, `jmp *` not safe before this point. */
+22 -17
View File
@@ -2080,38 +2080,43 @@ void __init init_speculation_mitigations(void)
/*
* SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY_FROM_PV conditional safety
*
* DO_SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY (X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV if used) is an
* unconditional WRMSR as the last action.
* A BHB sequence, if used, is a conditional action and last. If we
* have this, then we must have the LFENCE.
*
* If we have it, or we're not using any prior conditional mitigation,
* then it's safe to drop the LFENCE.
* Otherwise, DO_SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY (X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV if used) is an
* unconditional WRMSR. If we do have it, or we're not using any
* prior conditional block, then it's safe to drop the LFENCE.
*/
if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) ||
!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ENTRY_PV) )
if ( !cpu_has_bhb_seq &&
(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) ||
!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ENTRY_PV)) )
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_PV);
/*
* SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY_FROM_INTR conditional safety
*
* DO_SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY (X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV if used) is an
* unconditional WRMSR as the last action.
* A BHB sequence, if used, is a conditional action and last. If we
* have this, then we must have the LFENCE.
*
* If we have it, or we have no protections active in the block that
* is skipped when interrupting guest context, then it's safe to drop
* the LFENCE.
* Otherwise DO_SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY (X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV if used) is an
* unconditional WRMSR. If we have it, or we have no protections
* active in the block that is skipped when interrupting guest
* context, then it's safe to drop the LFENCE.
*/
if ( boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) ||
(!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ENTRY_PV) &&
!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_PV)) )
if ( !cpu_has_bhb_seq &&
(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV) ||
(!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ENTRY_PV) &&
!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SC_RSB_PV))) )
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_INTR);
/*
* SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY_FROM_VMX conditional safety
*
* Currently there are no safety actions with conditional branches, so
* no need for the extra safety LFENCE.
* A BHB sequence, if used, is the only conditional action, so if we
* don't have it, we don't need the safety LFENCE.
*/
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_VMX);
if ( !cpu_has_bhb_seq )
setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_VMX);
}
/*
+3
View File
@@ -178,6 +178,9 @@
/* Bugs. */
#define cpu_bug_fpu_ptrs boot_cpu_has(X86_BUG_FPU_PTRS)
#define cpu_has_bhb_seq (boot_cpu_has(X86_SPEC_BHB_TSX) || \
boot_cpu_has(X86_SPEC_BHB_LOOPS))
enum _cache_type {
CACHE_TYPE_NULL = 0,
CACHE_TYPE_DATA = 1,
+3
View File
@@ -55,5 +55,8 @@ XEN_CPUFEATURE(IBPB_ENTRY_HVM, X86_SYNTH(29)) /* MSR_PRED_CMD used by Xen for
#define X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_INTR X86_BUG(17) /* (No) safety LFENCE for SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY_INTR. */
#define X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_VMX X86_BUG(18) /* (No) safety LFENCE for SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY_VMX. */
#define X86_SPEC_BHB_TSX X86_BUG(19) /* Use clear_bhb_tsx for BHI mitigation. */
#define X86_SPEC_BHB_LOOPS X86_BUG(20) /* Use clear_bhb_loops for BHI mitigation.*/
/* Total number of capability words, inc synth and bug words. */
#define NCAPINTS (FSCAPINTS + X86_NR_SYNTH + X86_NR_BUG) /* N 32-bit words worth of info */
+2 -1
View File
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#define SCF_verw (1 << 3)
#define SCF_ist_ibpb (1 << 4)
#define SCF_entry_ibpb (1 << 5)
#define SCF_entry_bhb (1 << 6)
/*
* The IST paths (NMI/#MC) can interrupt any arbitrary context. Some
@@ -54,7 +55,7 @@
* Some speculative protections are per-domain. These settings are merged
* into the top-of-stack block in the context switch path.
*/
#define SCF_DOM_MASK (SCF_verw | SCF_entry_ibpb)
#define SCF_DOM_MASK (SCF_verw | SCF_entry_ibpb | SCF_entry_bhb)
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+30
View File
@@ -285,6 +285,17 @@
ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(DO_SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY maybexen=0), \
X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV
/*
* Clear the BHB to mitigate BHI. Used on eIBRS parts, and uses RETs
* itself so must be after we've perfomed all the RET-safety we can.
*/
testb $SCF_entry_bhb, %bl
jz .L\@_skip_bhb
ALTERNATIVE_2 "", \
"call clear_bhb_loops", X86_SPEC_BHB_LOOPS, \
"call clear_bhb_tsx", X86_SPEC_BHB_TSX
.L\@_skip_bhb:
ALTERNATIVE "lfence", "", X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_PV
.endm
@@ -323,6 +334,13 @@
ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(DO_SPEC_CTRL_ENTRY maybexen=1), \
X86_FEATURE_SC_MSR_PV
testb $SCF_entry_bhb, %bl
jz .L\@_skip_bhb
ALTERNATIVE_2 "", \
"call clear_bhb_loops", X86_SPEC_BHB_LOOPS, \
"call clear_bhb_tsx", X86_SPEC_BHB_TSX
.L\@_skip_bhb:
ALTERNATIVE "lfence", "", X86_SPEC_NO_LFENCE_ENTRY_INTR
.endm
@@ -423,6 +441,18 @@
.L\@_skip_msr_spec_ctrl:
/*
* Clear the BHB to mitigate BHI. Used on eIBRS parts, and uses RETs
* itself so must be after we've perfomed all the RET-safety we can.
*/
testb $SCF_entry_bhb, %bl
jz .L\@_skip_bhb
ALTERNATIVE_2 "", \
"call clear_bhb_loops", X86_SPEC_BHB_LOOPS, \
"call clear_bhb_tsx", X86_SPEC_BHB_TSX
.L\@_skip_bhb:
lfence
.endm
Reference in new issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.