x86/ucode: Rework AMD's microcode_fits()

This function is overloaded, creating complexity; 3 of 4 callers already only
want it for it's "applicable to this CPU or not" answer, and handle revision
calculations separately.

Change it to be microcode_fits_cpu(), returning a simple boolean.  The
checking of the equiv table can be simplified substantially too; A mapping
will only be inserted if it's correct for the CPU, so any nonzero equiv.sig
suffices to know that equiv.id is correct.

Drop compare_header() too, which is simiarly overloaded, and use
compare_revisions() directly.

Notably, this removes a path where cpu_request_microcode() inspects
currently-loaded microcode revision, just to discard the answer.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cooper committed 2024-11-12 19:16:53 +00:00
1 parent 502478bc1d
commit 39360c38c3
1 file changed
+24 -25
+24 -25
View File
@@ -182,36 +182,31 @@ static enum microcode_match_result compare_revisions(
return OLD_UCODE;
}
static enum microcode_match_result microcode_fits(
const struct microcode_patch *patch)
/*
* Check whether this microcode patch is applicable for the current CPU.
*
* AMD microcode blobs only have the "equivalent CPU identifier" which is a 16
* bit contraction of the 32 bit Family/Model/Stepping.
*
* We expect to only be run after scan_equiv_cpu_table() has found a valid
* mapping for the current CPU. If this is violated, the 0 in equiv.id will
* cause the patch to be rejected too.
*/
static bool microcode_fits_cpu(const struct microcode_patch *patch)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
const struct cpu_signature *sig = &per_cpu(cpu_sig, cpu);
ASSERT(equiv.sig);
if ( equiv.sig != sig->sig ||
equiv.id != patch->processor_rev_id )
return MIS_UCODE;
return compare_revisions(sig->rev, patch->patch_id);
}
static enum microcode_match_result compare_header(
const struct microcode_patch *new, const struct microcode_patch *old)
{
if ( new->processor_rev_id != old->processor_rev_id )
return MIS_UCODE;
return compare_revisions(old->patch_id, new->patch_id);
return equiv.id == patch->processor_rev_id;
}
static enum microcode_match_result cf_check compare_patch(
const struct microcode_patch *new, const struct microcode_patch *old)
{
/* Both patches to compare are supposed to be applicable to local CPU. */
ASSERT(microcode_fits(new) != MIS_UCODE);
ASSERT(microcode_fits(old) != MIS_UCODE);
ASSERT(microcode_fits_cpu(new));
ASSERT(microcode_fits_cpu(old));
return compare_header(new, old);
return compare_revisions(old->patch_id, new->patch_id);
}
static int cf_check apply_microcode(const struct microcode_patch *patch,
@@ -221,12 +216,14 @@ static int cf_check apply_microcode(const struct microcode_patch *patch,
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct cpu_signature *sig = &per_cpu(cpu_sig, cpu);
uint32_t rev, old_rev = sig->rev;
enum microcode_match_result result = microcode_fits(patch);
enum microcode_match_result result;
bool ucode_force = flags & XENPF_UCODE_FORCE;
if ( result == MIS_UCODE )
if ( !microcode_fits_cpu(patch) )
return -EINVAL;
result = compare_revisions(old_rev, patch->patch_id);
/*
* Allow application of the same revision to pick up SMT-specific changes
* even if the revision of the other SMT thread is already up-to-date.
@@ -396,8 +393,10 @@ static struct microcode_patch *cf_check cpu_request_microcode(
* If the new ucode covers current CPU, compare ucodes and store the
* one with higher revision.
*/
if ( (microcode_fits(mc->patch) != MIS_UCODE) &&
(!saved || (compare_header(mc->patch, saved) == NEW_UCODE)) )
if ( microcode_fits_cpu(mc->patch) &&
(!saved ||
compare_revisions(saved->patch_id,
mc->patch->patch_id) == NEW_UCODE) )
{
saved = mc->patch;
saved_size = mc->len;
Reference in new issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.