mirror of
https://github.com/xen-project/xen.git
synced 2026-10-28 02:01:24 +01:00
x86/svm: do not try to handle recalc NPT faults immediately
A recalculation NPT fault doesn't always require additional handling in hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(), moreover in general case if there is no explicit handling done there - the fault is wrongly considered fatal. This covers a specific case of migration with vGPU assigned which uses direct MMIO mappings made by XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping hypercall: at a moment log-dirty is enabled globally, recalculation is requested for the whole guest memory including those mapped MMIO regions which causes a page fault being raised at the first access to them; but due to MMIO P2M type not having any explicit handling in hvm_hap_nested_page_fault() a domain is erroneously crashed with unhandled SVM violation. Instead of trying to be opportunistic - use safer approach and handle P2M recalculation in a separate NPT fault by attempting to retry after making the necessary adjustments. This is aligned with Intel behavior where there are separate VMEXITs for recalculation and EPT violations (faults) and only faults are handled in hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(). Do it by also unifying do_recalc return code with Intel implementation where returning 1 means P2M was actually changed. Since there was no case previously where p2m_pt_handle_deferred_changes() could return a positive value - it's safe to replace ">= 0" with just "== 0" in VMEXIT_NPF handler. finish_type_change() is also not affected by the change as being able to deal with >0 return value of p2m->recalc from EPT implementation. Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Release-acked-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
81da3f2b4f
commit
51ca66c373
3 files changed
+10
-4
No files matched your search
@@ -2923,9 +2923,10 @@ void svm_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
|
||||
v->arch.hvm.svm.cached_insn_len = vmcb->guest_ins_len & 0xf;
|
||||
rc = vmcb->exitinfo1 & PFEC_page_present
|
||||
? p2m_pt_handle_deferred_changes(vmcb->exitinfo2) : 0;
|
||||
if ( rc >= 0 )
|
||||
if ( rc == 0 )
|
||||
/* If no recal adjustments were being made - handle this fault */
|
||||
svm_do_nested_pgfault(v, regs, vmcb->exitinfo1, vmcb->exitinfo2);
|
||||
else
|
||||
else if ( rc < 0 )
|
||||
{
|
||||
printk(XENLOG_G_ERR
|
||||
"%pv: Error %d handling NPF (gpa=%08lx ec=%04lx)\n",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ static int do_recalc(struct p2m_domain *p2m, unsigned long gfn)
|
||||
unsigned int level = 4;
|
||||
l1_pgentry_t *pent;
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
bool recalc_done = false;
|
||||
|
||||
table = map_domain_page(pagetable_get_mfn(p2m_get_pagetable(p2m)));
|
||||
while ( --level )
|
||||
@@ -402,6 +403,8 @@ static int do_recalc(struct p2m_domain *p2m, unsigned long gfn)
|
||||
clear_recalc(l1, e);
|
||||
err = p2m->write_p2m_entry(p2m, gfn, pent, e, level + 1);
|
||||
ASSERT(!err);
|
||||
|
||||
recalc_done = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
unmap_domain_page((void *)((unsigned long)pent & PAGE_MASK));
|
||||
@@ -448,12 +451,14 @@ static int do_recalc(struct p2m_domain *p2m, unsigned long gfn)
|
||||
clear_recalc(l1, e);
|
||||
err = p2m->write_p2m_entry(p2m, gfn, pent, e, level + 1);
|
||||
ASSERT(!err);
|
||||
|
||||
recalc_done = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
unmap_domain_page(table);
|
||||
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
return err ?: recalc_done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int p2m_pt_handle_deferred_changes(uint64_t gpa)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ static int finish_type_change(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
|
||||
rc = p2m->recalc(p2m, gfn);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* ept->recalc could return 0/1/-ENOMEM. pt->recalc could return
|
||||
* 0/-ENOMEM/-ENOENT, -ENOENT isn't an error as we are looping
|
||||
* 0/1/-ENOMEM/-ENOENT, -ENOENT isn't an error as we are looping
|
||||
* gfn here. If rc is 1 we need to have it 0 for success.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ( rc == -ENOENT || rc > 0 )
|
||||
|
||||