[XEN] Work around timeout bug in old Linux kernels where

timeout would erroneously be set far out in the future.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
This commit is contained in:
kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk committed 2006-06-29 14:22:56 +01:00
1 parent b687b766ae
commit a8fac23038
1 file changed
+21
+21
View File
@@ -391,9 +391,30 @@ long do_set_timer_op(s_time_t timeout)
struct vcpu *v = current;
if ( timeout == 0 )
{
stop_timer(&v->timer);
}
else
{
if ( unlikely(timeout < 0) ||
unlikely((uint32_t)((timeout - NOW()) >> 50) != 0) )
{
/*
* Linux workaround: occasionally we will see timeouts a long way
* in the future due to wrapping in Linux's jiffy time handling.
* We check for tiemouts wrapped negative, and for positive
* timeouts more than about 13 days in the future (2^50ns).
* The correct fix is to trigger an interrupt in a short while
* (since Linux in fact has pending work to do in this situation).
*/
DPRINTK("Warning: huge timeout set by domain %d (vcpu %d):"
" %"PRIx64"\n",
v->domain->domain_id, v->vcpu_id, (uint64_t)timeout);
timeout = NOW() + MILLISECS(10);
}
set_timer(&v->timer, timeout);
}
return 0;
}
Reference in new issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.