x86/PoD: tie together P2M update and increment of entry count

When not holding the PoD lock across the entire region covering P2M
update and stats update, the entry count - if to be incorrect at all -
should indicate too large a value in preference to a too small one, to
avoid functions bailing early when they find the count is zero. However,
instead of moving the increment ahead (and adjust back upon failure),
extend the PoD-locked region.

Fixes: 99af3cd40b ("x86/mm: Rework locking in the PoD layer")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
master commit: cc950c49ae
master date: 2024-03-21 09:48:10 +0100
This commit is contained in:
Jan Beulich committed 2024-03-27 12:29:33 +01:00
1 parent 471b53c6a0
commit bfb6920537
1 file changed
+13 -4
+13 -4
View File
@@ -1370,19 +1370,28 @@ mark_populate_on_demand(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn_l,
}
}
/*
* P2M update and stats increment need to collectively be under PoD lock,
* to prevent code elsewhere observing PoD entry count being zero despite
* there actually still being PoD entries (created by the p2m_set_entry()
* invocation below).
*/
pod_lock(p2m);
/* Now, actually do the two-way mapping */
rc = p2m_set_entry(p2m, gfn, INVALID_MFN, order,
p2m_populate_on_demand, p2m->default_access);
if ( rc == 0 )
{
pod_lock(p2m);
p2m->pod.entry_count += 1UL << order;
p2m->pod.entry_count -= pod_count;
BUG_ON(p2m->pod.entry_count < 0);
pod_unlock(p2m);
ioreq_request_mapcache_invalidate(d);
}
pod_unlock(p2m);
if ( rc == 0 )
ioreq_request_mapcache_invalidate(d);
else if ( order )
{
/*
Reference in new issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.