MISRA C Rule 20.7 states:
"Expressions resulting from the expansion of macro parameters shall
be enclosed in parentheses".
Document the behaviour of ECLAIR with respect to the CPP extension
that allows variable macro arguments to be named.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Reformat the list of GNU extensions and non-standard tokens used by Xen
in the ECLAIR configuration to make it easier to review any changes to it.
The extension "ext_missing_varargs_arg", which captures the GNU extension that
allows variadic functions and macros not to require at least one named parameter
before C23 has been renamed to "ext_c_missing_varargs_arg" in the current version
of ECLAIR used in CI, therefore this resolves regressions on MISRA C Rule 1.1:
"The program shall contain no violations of the standard C syntax and constraints,
and shall not exceed the implementation's translation limits."
As a result, Rule 1.1 now has no violations and is tagged as such.
Remove two unused configurations, that were already commented out.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Fixes: 631f535a3d ("xen: update ECLAIR service identifiers from MC3R1 to MC3A2.")
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Rule 2.1 states: "A project shall not contain unreachable code".
The placement of the loop after "out_unmap" can be moved earlier
in order to avoid the unconditional return to be marked as a cause of
unreachability for the loop, as this is a consequence of
"__builtin_unreachable" being configured in ECLAIR as being deliberately
unreachable, and therefore not reported as causing the code after the
"out_unmap" label to be unreachable.
Replacing one instance of "goto out_unmap" with the loop avoids
considering the unconditional return at the end of the function as a cause
of unreachability, while preserving the semantics of the function.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA Rule 20.7 states:
"Expressions resulting from the expansion of macro parameters
shall be enclosed in parentheses".
The files imported from the gnu-efi package are already deviated, yet
the macro NextMemoryDescriptor is used in non-excluded code, so a further
deviation is needed to exclude also any expansion of the macro.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 18.2 states: "Subtraction between pointers shall
only be applied to pointers that address elements of the same array".
Subtractions between pointer where at least one symbol is a
symbol defined by the linker are safe and thus deviated, because
the compiler cannot exploit the undefined behaviour that would
arise from violating the rules in this case.
To create an ECLAIR configuration that contains the list of
linker-defined symbols, the script "linker-symbols.sh" is used
after a build of xen (without static analysis) is performed.
The generated file "linker_symbols.ecl" is then used as part of the
static analysis configuration.
Additional changes to the ECLAIR integration are:
- perform a build of xen without static analysis during prepare.sh
- run the scripts to generated ECL configuration during the prepare.sh,
rather than analysis.sh
- export ECLAIR_PROJECT_ROOT earlier, to allow such generation
Additionally, the macro page_to_mfn performs a subtraction that is safe,
so its uses are deviated.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Prior to bd1664db7b ("xen/bitops: Introduce a multiple_bits_set() helper")
the definition of {COMPILE,RUNTIME}_CHECK was fully compliant with respect
to MISRA C Rule 20.7:
"Expressions resulting from the expansion of macro parameters shall be
enclosed in parentheses."
However, to allow testing function-like macros, parentheses on the "fn"
parameter were removed and thus new violations of the rule have been
introduced. Given the usefulness of this functionality,
it is deemed ok to deviate these two macros for this rule, because
their scope of (direct) usage is limited to just the file where they
are defined, and the possibility of misuses is unlikely.
No functional change.
Fixes: bd1664db7b ("xen/bitops: Introduce a multiple_bits_set() helper")
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
The rule disallows the usage of an identifier reserved by the C standard.
All identfiers starting with '__' are reserved for any use, so the label
can be renamed in order to avoid the violation.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zucchelli <alessandro.zucchelli@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Rule 7.3 states:
"The lowercase character l shall not be used in a literal suffix",
but the INTEL_MSR_RANGE macro uses the "ull" suffix.
The "u" is transformed in uppercase for consistency.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 18.6 states: "The address of an object with automatic
storage shall not be copied to another object that persists after
the first object has ceased to exist."
The rule is set as monitored and tagged clean, in order to block
the CI on any violations that may arise, allowing the presence
of cautions (currently there are no violations).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
Remove from the ECLAIR integration scripts an unused option, which
was already ignored, and make the help texts consistent
with the rest of the scripts.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses".
The local helpers GRP2 and XADD in the x86 emulator use their first
argument as the constant expression for a case label. This pattern
is deviated project-wide, because it is very unlikely to induce
developer confusion and result in the wrong control flow being
carried out.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses".
The helper macro bitmap_switch has parameters that cannot be parenthesized
in order to comply with the rule, as that would break its functionality.
Moreover, the risk of misuse due developer confusion is deemed not
substantial enough to warrant a more involved refactor, thus the macro
is deviated for this rule.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Release-Acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>
Rules 20.12 and 14.4 are now clean on ARM and x86, so they are added
to the list of clean guidelines.
Some guidelines listed in the additional clean section for ARM are also
clean on x86, so they can be removed from there.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
[stefano: remove 20.9 from commit message]
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
The DEFINE macro in asm-offsets.c (for all architectures) still generates
violations despite the file(s) being excluded from compliance, due to the
fact that in its expansion it sometimes refers entities in non-excluded files.
These corner cases are deviated by the configuration.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.12 states: "A macro parameter used as an operand to
the # or ## operators, which is itself subject to further macro replacement,
shall only be used as an operand to these operators".
In this case, builds where CONFIG_COMPAT=y the fpu_ctxt
macro is used both as a regular macro argument and as an operand for
stringification in the expansion of CHECK_FIELD_.
This is deviated using a SAF-x-safe comment.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Commit ea59e7d780 ("xen/bitops: Cleanup and new infrastructure ahead of
rearrangements") introduced new violations on previously clean rules 20.9 and
20.12 (clean on ARM only, right now).
The first is introduced because CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG in xen/self-tests.h is not
defined in the configuration under analysis. Using "defined()" instead avoids
relying on the preprocessor's behaviour upon encountering an undedfined identifier
and addresses the violation.
The violation of Rule 20.12 is due to "val" being used both as an ordinary argument
in macro RUNTIME_CHECK, and as a stringification operator.
No functional change.
Fixes: ea59e7d780 ("xen/bitops: Cleanup and new infrastructure ahead of rearrangements")
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Rule 8.4 states: "A compatible declaration shall be visible when an
object or function with external linkage is defined."
These variables are only referenced from assembly code, so they need to
be extern and there is negligible risk of them being used improperly
without noticing.
As a result, they can be exempted using a comment-based deviation.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Rule 8.4 states: "A compatible declaration shall be visible when
an object or function with external linkage is defined".
The function do_general_protection is either used is asm code
or only within this unit, so there is no risk of this getting
out of sync with its definition, but the function must remain
extern.
Therefore, this function is deviated using a comment-based deviation.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
The parentheses in this regular expression should be doubly
escaped because they undergo expansion twice.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
[stefano: fix commit message]
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
These files are used when debugging Xen, and are not meant to comply
with MISRA rules at the moment.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Some MISRA C rules already have no violations in Xen, so they can be
set as clean.
Reorder the rules in tagging.ecl according to version ordering
(i.e. sort -V) and split the configuration on multiple lines for
readability.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
This rule has no more violations in the codebase, so it can be
set as clean.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
xlat_malloc_init is touched for consistency, despite the construct
being already deviated.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
The count_args_ macro violates Rule 20.7, but it can't be made
compliant with Rule 20.7 without breaking its functionality. Since
it's very unlikely for this macro to be misused, it is deviated.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
These rules are concerned with the use of facilities provided by the
C Standard Library (qsort, bsearch for rule 21.9, and those provided
by <time.h> for rule 21.10).
Xen provides in its source code its own implementation of some of these
functions and macros, therefore a justification is provided for allowing
uses of these functions in the project.
The rules are also marked as clean as a consequence.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Tag the rule as clean, as there are no more violations in the codebase since
93c27d54dd ("xen/arm: Fix MISRA regression on R1.1,
flexible array member not at the end").
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Repositories under people/* only execute the analyze step if manually
triggered, but in order to avoid blocking the rest of the pipeline
if such step is not run, allow it to fail.
Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional chage.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
The ECLAIR service STD.emptrecd (which checks for empty structures) is being
deprecated; hence, as a preventive measure, STD.anonstct (which checks for
structures with no named members, an UB in C99) is used here; the latter being
a more general case than the previous one, this change does not affect the
analysis. This new service is already supported by the current version of
ECLAIR.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
MISRA C Rule 16.2 states:
"A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement".
The PROGRESS_VCPU local helper specifies a case that is directly
inside the compound statement of a for loop, hence violating the rule.
To avoid this, the construct is deviated with a text-based deviation.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 16.2 states:
"A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement".
Since complying with this rule of the x86 emulator would lead to
a lot of code duplication, it is deemed better to exempt those
files for this guideline.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Refactor the switch so that a violation of
MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved (A switch label shall only be used
when the most closely-enclosing compound statement is the body of
a switch statement).
Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to Rule 16.3.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Refactor the switch so that a violation of
MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved (a switch label should be immediately
enclosed in the compound statement of the switch).
The switch clause ending with the pseudo
keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to Rule 16.3.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Refactor the first clauses so that a violation of
MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved (a switch label should be immediately
enclosed in the compound statement of the switch).
Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to Rule 16.3.
Convert fallthrough comments in other clauses to the pseudo-keyword
while at it.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Refactor the first clauses so that a violation of
MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved (a switch label, "default" in this
case, should be immediately enclosed in the compound statement
of the switch). Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to Rule 16.3.
Convert fallthrough comments in other clauses to the pseudo-keyword
while at it.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Refactor the clauses so that a MISRA C Rule 16.2 violation is resolved
(A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement).
Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo keyword "fallthrough"
is an allowed exception to Rule 16.3.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Refactor the switch so that a violation of MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved
(A switch label shall only be used when the most closely-enclosing
compound statement is the body of a switch statement).
Note that the switch clause ending with the pseudo
keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to Rule 16.3.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Refactor the last clauses so that a violation of
MISRA C Rule 16.2 is resolved (A switch label shall only be used
when the most closely-enclosing compound statement is the body of
a switch statement). The switch clause ending with the
pseudo keyword "fallthrough" is an allowed exception to Rule 16.3.
No functional change.
Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
The rule states:
"All identifiers used in the controlling expression of #if or #elif
preprocessing directives shall be #define'd before evaluation".
In this case, using defined(identifier) is a MISRA-compliant
way to achieve the same effect.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
These deviations deal with the following cases:
- macro arguments used directly as initializer list arguments;
- uses of the __config_enabled macro, that can't be brought
into compliance without breaking its functionality;
- exclude files that are out of scope (efi headers and cpu_idle);
- uses of alternative_{call,vcall}[0-9] macros.
The existing configuration for R20.7 is reordered so that it matches the
cases listed in its documentation comment.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should either gain additional parentheses or have
their expressions simplified to ensure that all current and future users
will be safe with respect to expansions that can possibly alter the
semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should either gain additional parentheses or have
their expressions simplified to ensure that all current and future users
will be safe with respect to expansions that can possibly alter the
semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@cloud.com>
Rule 20.4 states: "A macro shall not be defined with the same name
as a keyword".
Defining this macro with the same name as the inline keyword
allows for additionally checking that out-of-lined static inline
functions end up in the correct section while minimizing churn and
has a positive impact on the overall safety. See [1] for additional
context on the motivation of this deviation.
No functional change.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/adaa6d55-266d-4df8-8967-9340080d17e4@citrix.com/
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Certain macros are allowed to violate the Rule, since their meaning and
intended use is well-known to all Xen developers.
Variadic macros that rely on the GCC extension for removing a trailing
comma when token pasting the variable argument are similarly
well-understood and therefore allowed.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
These constants are parenthesized to avoid them from
possibly influencing the semantics of the constructs where it is used,
especially inside macros invocations.
This also resolves some violations of MISRA C Rule 20.7
("Expressions resulting from the expansion of macro parameters shall
be enclosed in parentheses").
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
These functions never saw a usage of their return value since
they were introduced, so it can be dropped since their usages
violate MISRA C Rule 17.7:
"The value returned by a function having non-void return type shall be used".
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
These files contain several deliberate violations of MISRA C rules such
as:
* R20.12 for macros DEFINE and OFFSET, where the second argument
of OFFSET is a macro and is used as a normal parameter and a
stringification operand.
* R2.1 because the file is not linked. That said it was decided to
deviate the rule itself to address that aspect).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@amazon.com>
The files under 'include/acpi/ac*.h' and 'include/acpi/plaform/ac*.h'
are inherited from Linux and ACPI CA, therefore they are not subject to
MISRA compliance at the moment.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Unwanted leading '+'-s cause the deviation not to work as expected,
leading to wrong analysis counts.
Fixes: 11126964d8 ("automation/eclair_analysis: avoid violation of MISRA Rule 2.1")
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
There is no path that reaches the call to 'advance_pc', thus violating MISRA C
Rule 2.1.
A call to ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() is added after the switch, despite this being
useful to detect errors only in debug builds; if that marker is ever reached,
a domain crash is triggered, as a defensive coding measure.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
The statements after a call to the noreturn function 'do_unexpected_trap'
can't be reached, thus violating MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.1
("A project shall not contain unreachable code.").
ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() is used to signal that the unreachable break-s are used as
a defensive coding measure to prevent inadvertent fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
There are no paths that can reach the last return statement
of function 'vgic_v3_its_mmio_write' in 'vcig-v3-its.c' and
'arch_memory_op' in 'arch/arm/mm.c', thus violating
MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.1:
"A project shall not contain unreachable code".
Therefore, an ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() is inserted to remove the unreachable
return statement and protect against possible mistakes.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Such declaration is moved in order to provide it for Arm and PPC,
whilst not violating MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.4 in common/page_alloc.c:
"A compatible declaration shall be visible when an object or
function with external linkage is defined".
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
The presence of an unlinked object file triggers a violation
of MISRA C Rule 2.1, which is deviated, as it's not part of
the final Xen binary.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Nicola Vetrini